This morning I watched the first episode of the Sherlock TV series while I did my laundry. I had seen the first couple episodes a few years back, but I wanted to refresh my memory. I'm glad I did! This time I paid more attention to the different camera angles, shots, and POVs and what they added to the scenes. I really enjoyed that the episode started by introducing us to John Watson. It makes us more familiar with him and it makes Sherlock Holmes seem more mysterious. I also really love how the show portrays Sherlock's thought process when he's at the crime scene. The text that pops up on screen makes the audience aware of exactly what Sherlock is thinking. Once I watch more of the show, I'll make a more in depth post comparing the original works by Arthur Conan Doyle to the TV series.
Fiction, Crime, and Empire by Jon Thomson was a pretty useful tool when thinking about the essay. It explores the nature of crime fiction, describing how it tells the story of a real crime but in a slightly modified way. We view these true crime stories as non-fiction, but are there elements of fiction within them? He says something happens similarly when crimes are reported through the media, it almost seems like they're run through some sort of filter. In his video lecture where he talks about Fiction, Crime, and Empire, Dr. Reed talks about how our interest in crime raises the more knowledge we have about that crime or criminal. Overall, the article observes how criminals are viewed in various mediums and the difference in how we view fiction and non fiction stories about murder.

Comments
Post a Comment